But the fact is, for four years people that read the New York Times or watch CNN believed the exact opposite. They all knew that Mueller didn’t have a case they all knew there wasn’t any collusion. “But, Rush…” I know I’ve said it, but I’m telling you, it’s a direct way of pointing everybody involved in it knew it - including John Durham, including Bill Barr. I’m just telling you, the way this guy wrote the piece today, it’s persuasive. Now, I know you say, “Well, Rush, you’ve said that.” They knew, for example, that Robert Mueller had two objectives: To continue the investigation, fraudulent though it was, in order to accomplish the second objective, and that is to cover up the illegality of what everybody was doing. They knew that they were participating in an illegal attempt to overturn the election results of 2016. Everybody involved in it knew! They knew it was a hoax. They have a piece today that’s right on the money. Look at four years of abject lies on Trump-Russia collusion, and you know something?Ĭonservative Treehouse today, which is a bright, relatively new - and it’s not new, but compared to some of the other conservative blogs out there it is. The New York Times is probably the most ill-informed media audience out there. Who is the most ill-informed? I’d say the NPR crowd is probably the most ill-informed. I don’t think there’s a more informed or educated audience in all of media than you. I think all of you are in this the most educated, erudite audience in all of media - and I mean that. Not that any of you need the proof don’t misunderstand. Right here is an example of one of the things that I have been attempting to convince, persuade, bludgeon people with for a number of years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |